Avalanche (un)safety tips and the hype of disaster
The news are all over about people getting killed in [tag-tec]avalanches[/tag-tec] this winter. Ski patrollers and sheriffs at Jackson Hole, Wyoming have referred to this season so far as the most stressful one “since the mining days”. A record number of skiers and tourskiers have been reported to die under avalanches in the Rockies and across the American West in December.
What’s really crazy is the way the media inflates the gravity of the situation. As if snowfall this year were deadlier than ever before. Of course, I acknowledge the fact that there have been a record number of fatalities this winter and naturally, we feel deep compassion for fellow mountaineers and skiers and their families who have fallen victim to the mountains. But the natural instinct of mainstream media is to inflate these disasters and manufacture half-truths, stories about how much more deadly the snow is than ever before.
Mainstream media tends to quote experts on these issues, but of course, these quotes are just fragments of opinions carefully constructed to support the story of the journalist. And the primary aim of the story is to sell itself.
How dare I say this? Here’s how: any seasoned [tag-tec]mountain guide[/tag-tec] or mountaineer will tell you, that on no day is the whole mountain completely safe or completely dangerous. Depending on the conditions (wind, recent snowfall, sun are the most crucial factors) you always have safe and unsafe slopes and valleys. Of course, you risk a whole lot more when you go out in grade 4-5 conditions than when you go out in grade 1-2…
The mountains have always been dangerous. Some years the avalanche death toll is higher, than others. The chances of anyone getting killed in an avalanche when out in reasonable conditons (under grade 3) is slim. This never gets mentioned in the avalanche-related news stories read by hundreds of thousands of people.
Let’s give credit to the New York Times, though, for this really cool illustration of a crappy, avalanche-risky hillside:
At least they’re good at making diagrams and giving scientific explanations…
What you need to understand from this diagram
Upside down storms – as they are remarked in the nytimes article – where temperature increases during the storm will result in a layer of wet, heavy snow resting on top of colder, dry and less dense snow. Until these layers settle on one another, they are fragile, meaning the top layer can slip on the bottom layer, resulting in slabs breaking away. Slabs arel likely to break away where zones of weakness are close to one another.
What can you do to save your (and your buddies’) butts?
- never go out (off piste skiing or climbing) in grade 3 and higher avalanche warning. Stick to mountaineering on tight ridges, avoiding [tag-tec]couloirs[/tag-tec] or do [tag-tec]rock climbing[/tag-tec] routes. Ski on piste. If it’s boring, hit the moguls or head for the park.
- from year-to-year, refresh your knowledge of using avalanche safety geaer: transciever, shovel, pole.
- oh, and have ‘em with you as well.
- from time to time, have yourself burried 1 metre (3 feet or something) deep in snow by your buddies. Getting used to the feeling, you’ll panic less when hit by an avalanche and therefore save air. Stay under the snow for as long as you can bare (3-5 min) and try getting out without help.
- although it’s unlikely that anyone will perform an avalanche test every time you cross a new hillside, you should be familiar with avalanche testing. Check out zis video for 10 not-so-quick but easy steps.